Central Amador Water Project Water Right Application
4 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2016092008
Lead Agency
Amador Water Agency
(AWA)
Document Title
Central Amador Water Project Water Right Application
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
11/14/2017
Present Land Use
Not Applicable; no new facilitites to be constructed
Document Description
AWA is requesting a water right permit to store up to 1,400 acre-feet per year (AFY) in Lower Bear River Reservoir and to directly divert up to 1,050 AFY of water that is currently diverted by Jackson Valley Irrigation District (JVID) further downstream. The permit would allow: 1) increase maximum rates of direct diversion allowed from the Bear River and North Fork Mokelumne River from 3 cubic feet per second to 5 cfs., with combined rates between these sources not to exceed 5 cfs; 2) increase the amount of water that may be diverted into storage annually at Lower Bear River Reservoir from 1,600 AF to 3,000 AF; and 3) increase the amount of water that may be beneficially used annually, whether by direct diversion or re-diversion of water released from storage, from 1,150 AF to 2,200 AF. The diversion would use existing facilities; no new construction is needed.
Contact Information
Name
Gene Mancebo
Agency Name
Amador County Water Agency
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Counties
Amador
State Highways
88, 26
Schools
Pioneer& Pine Grove ES
Waterways
Mokelumne River, Bear River, Tiger Creek, Cole Creek
Other Location Info
Pioneer
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
Amador Water Agency
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
Yes
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
No
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
Yes
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.