ArtCenter College of Design Master Plan

Document Description: ArtCenter College of Design proposes a two phase 15-year Master Plan. Upon completion, total enrollment would increase from 2,000 full-time equivalent students to 2,500 FTE students and increase faculty/staff from 753 to 994 between the two campuses. South Campus; Phase 1 - construction of two eight-story, 100-foot tall buildings for academic programs and student housing; elevated open "quad" area over the Metro Gold Line; mobility hub below the quad area; renovation and internal floor area addition to an existing two-story building; renovation of an existing six-story building for academic purposes, and installation of an 8,000 square foot digital gallery on southeastern facade of 1111 S. Arroyo Pkwy. South campus Phase II - demolition of a one-story building and construction of four eight-story, 100-foot tall, buidings for academic programs and/or student housings and elevated "quad" area. Hillside Campus, Phase I- demolition, renovations and additions to existing buildings; installation of photovoltaic solar canopies on the existing parking lots; modifications to the parking and circulation plan. Hillside Campus Phase II - reconstruction and additions to the maintenance building. No development is proposed on the undeveloped portions of the hillside campus.

Contact Information: David Sinclair
City of Pasadena
175 N. Garfield Avenue
Pasadena, CA 91101
626-744-6766

Coordinates: 34°07'37.38"N 118°08'56.62"W
Cities: Pasadena
Counties: Los Angeles
Cross Streets: Hillside campus: 1700 Lida Street/ South Campus South Raymond Ave, South Arroyo Parkway
Zip: 91103
Total Acres: 6.68, 155.95
Parcel #: 5720-007-023, 5720-007-025, 5720-007-026, 5720-008-011, 5720-008-012, 5705-002-006
State Highways: I-210, SR-110, SR-2
Railways: Metro Gold Line
Schools: Blair MS and HS
Township: 1N
Range: 12W
Section: 33/18
Base: SBM

(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment: No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA: Yes
(2b) A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA: No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project: Yes
(4) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project: No
(5) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA: Yes