Bridge Retrofit Project on Sac-05 and Sac-160 EA: 03-3F090 (Lake or Streambed Alteration No. 1600-2017-0346-R2)

10 Documents in Project

Summary

SCH Number
2016072040
Lead Agency
Caltrans 3 (Marysville) (California Department of Transportation, District 3)
Document Title
Bridge Retrofit Project on Sac-05 and Sac-160 EA: 03-3F090 (Lake or Streambed Alteration No. 1600-2017-0346-R2)
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
2/26/2019

Document Description
CDFW has executed Lake and Streambed Alteration Agreement Number 1600-2017-0346-R2, pursuant to section 1602 of the Fish and Game code to the project Applicant, Caltrans. The project is limited to seismic retrofits for the Sac River Bridge at SR 160 and the Mokelumne River Bridge at I-5. The Sac River Bridge Project will install steel column casings at the bents and hinge retainers at all hinges and the Mokelumne River Bridge project will retrofit piers, strengthen truss members, including replacing selected rivets with hex-structural bolts and replace selected latticed truss members with cover platers.

Contact Information
Suzanne Gilmore
CDFW
1701 Nimbus Road, Suite A
Sacramento, CA 95670

Phone : (916) 358-2950

Location

Cities
Sacramento
Counties
Sacramento
Cross Streets
SR 160 & Del Paso Blvd; I 5, Twin Cities Rd, SR 160 & River Rd
Zip
95816
Total Acres
various
Parcel #
various
State Highways
I 5, SR 160
Schools
Bates ES
Waterways
Mokelumne River and Sacramento River
Other Information
Multiple Lat/Long *SEE NOD FOR DETAILS

Notice of Determination

Approving Agency
CDFW
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Final Environmental Document Available at
1701 Nimbus Road, Rancho Cordova, CA 95670

Determinations

(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
Download CSV New Search