Stonegate Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map and General Plan Amendment/Rezone
10 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2016062049
Lead Agency
City of Chico
Document Title
Stonegate Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map and General Plan Amendment/Rezone
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
9/27/2018
Present Land Use
Z: R1-RC, OR-RC, RS-20-PD-RC, OS1, OS2 CC-RC
GPD: LDR/RCO, OMU/RCO, VLDR/RCO, POS, SOS
Document Description
The project would subdivide a 313-acre project site into a combination of open space (136 acres), public right-of-way, recreational park lots (3.5 acres), low density residential (423 units, 81 acres), medium density residential (13.4 acres, two parcels), and commercial sites (36.6 acres, three parcels). A use permit is also requested to allow ground-floor residential uses in a Community Commercial (CC) zoning district. project applications consist of the Stonegate Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map (S 15-05), General Plan Amendment 15-02, Rezone 15-02, and Use Permit 18-14.
Contact Information
Name
Mike Sawley
Agency Name
City of Chico
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Address
Phone
Location
Coordinates
Cities
Chico
Counties
Butte
Cross Streets
Bruce Road, between E. 20th Street
Zip
94044
Total Acres
313
Parcel #
002-190-041, 018-510-007, -008, -009
State Highways
HWY 99
Schools
Chapman ES, CCS
Waterways
Butte Creek
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
Chico City Council
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
Yes
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
Yes
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.