South Fork Trinity River Road Decommissioning Project
2 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2016062036
Lead Agency
California Department of Parks and Recreation
Document Title
South Fork Trinity River Road Decommissioning Project
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
7/29/2016
Present Land Use
US national forest lands
Document Description
The OHMVR Division proposes to award grant funds to the Trinity County Resource Conservation District for the South Fork-Trinity River Road Decommissioning Project. The project would decommission 22 miles of roads with 76 stream crossings that pose risks to water quality and watershed resources. These roads are non-designated forest system routes closed to public and administrative access. The project was created by the TCRCD by taking the highest priority routes identified by the Shasta-Trinity National Forest in four watershed restoration and/or fuel reduction studies. The routes currently pose aquatic risks to anadromous fisheries due to sedimentation issues.
Contact Information
Name
George MacDougall
Agency Name
Parks and Recreation
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Counties
Shasta
Cross Streets
Various in Shasta-Trinity National Forest
Zip
various
Total Acres
20.5
Parcel #
various
Waterways
South Fork Trinity River, Trinity River, Hayfork Creek
Other Location Info
Weaverville
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
CA Dept. of Parks and Recreation, OHMVR Division
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.