Sutter Bypass Widening and Rehabilitation Project
8 Documents in Project
Download CSV
New Search
Summary
- SCH Number
- 2016062001
- Lead Agency
- Caltrans 3 (Marysville) (California Department of Transportation, District 3)
- Document Title
- Sutter Bypass Widening and Rehabilitation Project
- Document Type
- NOD - Notice of Determination
- Received
- Posted
- 12/11/2018
- Present Land Use
- Primarily ag with an 80 acre min parcel size (AG-80) and ag with a 40 acre min parcel size
- Document Description
- Resurfacing, Restoration, and Rehabilitation project to upgrade SR 20 to meet current design standards and extend its service life. The proposed project will consist of pavement rehabilitation and shoulder widening on SR 20 between PM 5.0 and 11.3 in Sutter County. The proposed project will also replace the existing bridge over the Wadsworth Canal. The purpose of the project is to bring this section SR 20 up to current Caltrans standards.
- Contact Information
-
Nicholas White
Central Valley Regional Water Board
11020 Sun Center Dr., #200
Rancho Cordova, CA 95670
Phone : (916) 464-4856
Location
- Coordinates
- 39.147939°'"N 121.826609°'"W
- Cities
- Yuba City
- Counties
- Sutter
- Cross Streets
- West Butte Rd east to Lytle Rd
- Zip
- 95982
- Parcel #
- 13-140-010 to 13-270-049
- State Highways
- SR 20
- Airports
- Vanderford Ranch Co Airport
- Schools
- Sutter HS
- Waterways
- Wadsworth Canal, Sutter Bypass
- Other Location Info
- Town of Sutter
- Other Information
- PM 5.0 to 11.3
Notice of Determination
- Approving Agency
- Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board
- Approving Agency Role
- Responsible Agency
- Approved On
- Final Environmental Document Available at
- 703 B Street, Marysville, CA 95901
Determinations
- (1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
- No
- (2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
- No
- (2b) A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
- Yes
- (2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
- No
- (3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
- Yes
- (4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
- N/A
- (5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
- No
- (6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
- No