Concurrence in the Issuance of a Revised Solid Waste Facilities Permit for Florin Perkins Public Disposal Site MRF/LVTS, SWIS No. 34-AA-0221

3 Documents in Project

Summary

SCH Number
2016052026
Lead Agency
Sacramento, City of (City of Sacramento)
Document Title
Concurrence in the Issuance of a Revised Solid Waste Facilities Permit for Florin Perkins Public Disposal Site MRF/LVTS, SWIS No. 34-AA-0221
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received

Document Description
Revised Solid Waste Facilities Permit to allow the following design and operational changes: An increase in the daily tonnage limit from 500 tpd to 1000 tpd (500 tons source separated Inert Debris and 500 tons of all other allowed waste); An increase in daily vehicle limit from 233 vpd to 258 vpd; An expansion of the permitted facility boundary from 10 acres to 11.5 acres; Addition of new on-site activities, including wood/non-curbside green material grinding, inert debris crushing, composition shingle grinding, and much drying for on-site sales; Addition of hours of operation for the Grinding and Crushing Activities, which are 8:00 am - 6:00pm, 7 days a week.

Contact Information
Marcus Santillano
CalRecycle
P.O. Box 4025
Sacramento, CA 95812-4025

916-341-6328

Location

Coordinates
38°32'16.24"N 121°23'11"W
Cities
Sacramento
Counties
Sacramento
Cross Streets
Florin Perkins Rd and Jackson Rd
Zip
95826
Total Acres
11.5
Parcel #
061-0151-058, -0150-042
State Highways
SR 16, US 50
Schools
Earl Warren, Golden Empire Isador Cohen, Joseph Bonheim, OW Erie
Waterways
American River
Base
MDBM
Other Information
wine ES, Golden Empire PS

Notice of Determination

Approving Agency
CalRecycle
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Final EIR Available Location
1001 I Street, P.O. Box 4025, Sacramento, CA 95812-4025

Determinations

(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
N/A
Download CSV New Search