SMUD Franklin Electric Transmission Project Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration Addendum
4 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2016042050
Lead Agency
Sacramento Municipal Utility District
Document Title
SMUD Franklin Electric Transmission Project Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration Addendum
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
7/13/2017
Present Land Use
Substation site: present land use- ag
Z:AG-80
GPD:Ag
Document Description
SMUD adopted an Initial Study/MND for the Franklin Electric Project in October 2016. The project includes constructing and operating a new bulk transmission substation (Franklin Bulk substation), constructing and operating a new distribution substation (Franklin Distribution substation), modifying existing and constructing new overhead 69 kilovolt (kV) and 230kV power lines to link the substations to the electrical grid, and dismantling a nearby distribution substation. Since adoption of the 2016 IS/MND, MSUD has refined the substation design to address flood risks.
Contact Information
Name
Kim Crawford
Agency Name
Sacramento Municipal Utility District
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Coordinates
Cities
Elk Grove
Counties
Sacramento
Cross Streets
Franklin Blvd/Hood Franklin Rd, and Franklin Blvd from Elk Grove and Lambert Rd
Zip
95757
Total Acres
17
Parcel #
132-0132-029. -044
State Highways
I-5
Railways
Western Pacific Railroad
Airports
Flying B Ranch
Schools
ES
Waterways
Stone Lake, Snodgrass Slough, Irrigation Basins, emergency
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
Sacramento Municipal Utility District
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.