Concurrence in the Issuance of a Revised Solid Waste Facilities Permit for West Coast Waste Integrated Reyccling Facility in Fresno County, SWIS No. 10-AA-0197

4 Documents in Project

Summary

SCH Number
2016041045
Lead Agency
Fresno, City of (City of Fresno)
Document Title
Concurrence in the Issuance of a Revised Solid Waste Facilities Permit for West Coast Waste Integrated Reyccling Facility in Fresno County, SWIS No. 10-AA-0197
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
1/23/2017
Present Land Use
Currently used for a green and wood waste chipping and grinding facility. Z: M-3, Heavy Industrial

Document Description
Revised Solid Waste Facilities Permit to allow the following design and operational changes: Operations of a Transfer/Processing Facility/ Material Recovery Facility; 24 Hours/Day, 7 days/Week Hours of Operation for Facility Operations and 6:00am - 5:00pm Monday through Saturday for Waste Receipt; Permitted Maximum tonnage of 1500 TPD; Traffic Volume of 330 VPD; Permitted Acreage of 18 acres; Acceptance of Green Waste, Wood Waste Food Waste, Municipal Solid Waste (MSW), Construction and Demolition (CDI) and Waste Tires; Construction of a MRF; Installation of Phase I Covered Composting System.

Contact Information
Marcus Santillano
CalRecycle
P.O. Box 4025
Sacramento, CA 95812-4025

Phone : (916) 341-6328

Location

Coordinates
36°41'20.05"N 119°45'06.00"W
Cities
Fresno
Counties
Fresno
Cross Streets
Golden State Frontage Rd and Golden State Blvd
Zip
93725
Total Acres
18.16
Parcel #
330-060-49s, 330-040-42
State Highways
SR-99
Railways
ATSF RR; Southern P
Schools
Orange Center ES
Waterways
North Central Canal; Fresno Colony Canal
Township
14S
Range
20E
Section
25
Base
MtDiablo

Notice of Determination

Approving Agency
CalRecycle
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Final EIR Available Location
1001 I Street, P.O. Box 4025, Sacramento, CA 95812-4025

Determinations

(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
N/A
Download CSV New Search