Pismo Creek Scour Repair Project (Streambed Alteration Agreement No. 1600-2017-0271-R4) Minor Amendment No. 1

SCH Number: 2016031041
Lead Agency: Caltrans 5 (San Luis Obispo) (California Department of Transportation, District 5)
Document Title: Pismo Creek Scour Repair Project (Streambed Alteration Agreement No. 1600-2017-0271-R4) Minor Amendment No. 1
Document Type: NOD - Notice of Determination
Received: 5/7/2019

Document Description: On March 20, 2018, the California Department of Wildlife (CDFW) executed Streambed Alteration Agreement (SAA) number 1600-2017-0271-R4, pursuant to section 1602 of Fish and game Code to the Project applicant, California Department of Transportation (Caltrans). The Project involves both work to repair and armor the banks along a 222-foot reach of Pismo Creek where it flows westerly beneath SR 101 and its appurtenant bridges and construction of new piers to fortify an existing bent supporting the westernmost of the three bridges. On March 29, 2019, Caltrans requested revisions to the allowed temporary water diversion window, constituting this Minor Amendment No. 1 of the LSAA.

Contact Information: Steve Hulbert
Department of Fish and Wildlife Central Region
1234 East Shaw Avenue
Fresno, CA 93710
5592434014 ext.289

Cities: Pismo Beach
Counties: San Luis Obispo
Other Location Info: The Project is generally located along a 222-foot reach of Pismo Creek where it flows westerly beneath State Route (SR) 101 in the city of Pismo, San Luis Obispo County, California.

Approving Agency: CDFW
Approving Agency Role: Responsible Agency
Approved On: 5/6/2019
Final EIR Available Location: The mitigated negative declaration prepared for the project is available to the general public at the office location listed above for the Lead.

(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment: No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA: No
(2b) A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA: Yes
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project: Yes
(4) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project: No
(5) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA: No