Lake or Streambed Alteration Agreement No. 1600-2015-0510-R1
3 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2016022076
Lead Agency
Shasta County
Document Title
Lake or Streambed Alteration Agreement No. 1600-2015-0510-R1
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
6/13/2016
Present Land Use
Bridge; Zoning; Zoning: Exclusive Agriculture: GP designation: Agricultural Grazinga nd RUral Residential B
Document Description
The project is limited to replacement of the existing three span 56-foot long by 17.7 foot wide timber bridge at Inwood Road over South Fork Bear Creek with a new single span 73-foot long by 23.54-foot wide cast-in-place, concrete box girder bridge. The existing bridge will be demolished and removed for construction of the new bridge. The road will be closed, with no traffic detour provided. Temporary instream work includes placement of two-24" culverts and clean gravel to provide a temporary roadway for construction access and a temporary pad to place the falsework. A seasonal diversion will likely be needed to dewater the instream worksite. Additional work includes rock slope protection using 1/4 ton rip-rap (145 cubic yards total) on each side of the stream channel to protect the abutments.
Contact Information
Name
Kate Grossman
Agency Name
CDFW
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Coordinates
Counties
Shasta
Cross Streets
Inwood Road and Ponderosa Way
Zip
96088
Total Acres
2.4
Parcel #
093-260-023
State Highways
44
Schools
Black Butte Jr. H & Elem.
Waterways
South Fork Bear Creek
Township
31N
Range
1W
Section
23
Base
MDMB
Other Location Info
Shingletown
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
CDFW
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.