Use Permit and Lot Line Adjustment Application No. PLN2015-0137 - Growers Direct Nut Company, Inc.
3 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2016012046
Lead Agency
Stanislaus County
Document Title
Use Permit and Lot Line Adjustment Application No. PLN2015-0137 - Growers Direct Nut Company, Inc.
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
6/24/2016
Present Land Use
PLU:Zoning: A-2-40 (General Ag) GPD: Agriculture
Document Description
Request to expand an existing walnut shelling, processing, and storage facility by constructing approximately 181,300 sf of building space for storage, processing, pasteurizing and office operations on two parcels totaling 23.58+/- acres in the A-2-40 (Gen Ag) zoning district. The proposal also includes the conversion of an existing 56,000 sf building from agricultural storage to processing facility. A max of 150 employees is anticipated at full build-out. The project also consists of a lot line adjustment among three adjoining parcels. The property is located at 2288 Geer Rd, between E. Whitmore Ave and Fox Rd, east of the City of Hughson.
Contact Information
Name
Jeremy Ballard
Agency Name
Stanislaus County
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Cities
Hughson
Counties
Stanislaus
Cross Streets
E Whitmore Avenue
Zip
95326
Total Acres
23 +/-
Parcel #
018-010-025, 026, 021
Railways
BNSF
Schools
Hughson HS, Fox Road ES, Hughson ES
Waterways
Tuolumne River
Township
04
Range
10
Section
11
Base
MDBM
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
Stanislaus County Planning Commission
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.