Aspen Fales Shoulder Widening Project (Lake or Streambed Alteration Agreement No. 1600-2018-0124-R6)
9 Documents in Project
Download CSV
New Search
Summary
- SCH Number
- 2016012040
- Lead Agency
- Caltrans 9 (Bishop) (California Department of Transportation, District 9)
- Document Title
- Aspen Fales Shoulder Widening Project (Lake or Streambed Alteration Agreement No. 1600-2018-0124-R6)
- Document Type
- NOD - Notice of Determination
- Received
- Document Description
- CDFW is executing Lake and Streambed Alteration Agreement number 1600-2018-0124-R6, pursuant to section 1602 of the Fish and Game Code to the Permittee, the California Department of Transportation, represented by Ms. Angela Calloway. The Aspen Fales Shoulder Widening includes the expansion of the existing shoulders from two-to-three to eight feet along 3.1 miles of existing highway. This project will include eight activities subject to CDGW's jurisdiction under Fish and Game Code Section 1600. The Project authorizes temporary diversion of flowing water, and impacts to 0.157 acres of vegetated CDFW-jurisdictional streambed. Equipment storage and staging will be located in paved, upland locations.
- Contact Information
-
Scott Wilson
CDFW, Inland Deserts Region
3602 Inland Empire Boulevard, Suite C-220
Ontario, CA 91764
760-200-9394
Location
- Coordinates
- 38°20'56.2"N 119°22'14.6"W
- Counties
- Mono
- Cross Streets
- SR 395
- Zip
- 93517
- State Highways
- 395
- Waterways
- Fales Hot Springs and Hot Creek, West Walker River and Topaz Reservoir
- Township
- 6N
- Range
- 24E
- Section
- 20N
- Other Location Info
- Bridgeport
- Other Information
- Mount Jackson U.S.
Notice of Determination
- Approving Agency
- CDFW
- Approving Agency Role
- Responsible Agency
- Approved On
- Final EIR Available Location
- 3602 Inland Empire Blvd., Suite C-220, Ontario, CA 91764
Determinations
- (1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
- No
- (2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
- Yes
- (2b) A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
- No
- (3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
- Yes
- (4) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
- No
- (5) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
- Yes