Aspen Fales Shoulder Widening Project (Lake or Streambed Alteration Agreement No. 1600-2018-0124-R6)

9 Documents in Project

Summary

SCH Number
2016012040
Lead Agency
Caltrans 9 (Bishop) (California Department of Transportation, District 9)
Document Title
Aspen Fales Shoulder Widening Project (Lake or Streambed Alteration Agreement No. 1600-2018-0124-R6)
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received

Document Description
CDFW is executing Lake and Streambed Alteration Agreement number 1600-2018-0124-R6, pursuant to section 1602 of the Fish and Game Code to the Permittee, the California Department of Transportation, represented by Ms. Angela Calloway. The Aspen Fales Shoulder Widening includes the expansion of the existing shoulders from two-to-three to eight feet along 3.1 miles of existing highway. This project will include eight activities subject to CDGW's jurisdiction under Fish and Game Code Section 1600. The Project authorizes temporary diversion of flowing water, and impacts to 0.157 acres of vegetated CDFW-jurisdictional streambed. Equipment storage and staging will be located in paved, upland locations.

Contact Information
Scott Wilson
CDFW, Inland Deserts Region
3602 Inland Empire Boulevard, Suite C-220
Ontario, CA 91764

760-200-9394

Location

Coordinates
38°20'56.2"N 119°22'14.6"W
Counties
Mono
Cross Streets
SR 395
Zip
93517
State Highways
395
Waterways
Fales Hot Springs and Hot Creek, West Walker River and Topaz Reservoir
Township
6N
Range
24E
Section
20N
Other Location Info
Bridgeport
Other Information
Mount Jackson U.S.

Notice of Determination

Approving Agency
CDFW
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Final EIR Available Location
3602 Inland Empire Blvd., Suite C-220, Ontario, CA 91764

Determinations

(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(5) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Download CSV New Search