CR 67 Br. Replacement Project over Branch Howard Slough Br. No:11C0015 to 11C0017 (EP 19472)
7 Documents in Project
Download CSV
New Search
Print
Summary
- SCH Number
- 2016012036
- Lead Agency
- Glenn County
- Document Title
- CR 67 Br. Replacement Project over Branch Howard Slough Br. No:11C0015 to 11C0017 (EP 19472)
- Document Type
- NOD - Notice of Determination
- Received
- Posted
- 1/29/2021
- Document Description
- To replace the existing single lane County Road 67 Bridge 11C-17 (Bridge 17). The new bridge will be 32.6 feet wide and 107.6 feet long, with two travel lanes and includes: a 4-span cast-in-place reinforced concrete slab bridge supported by 24-inch diameter piers and reinforced concrete abutments; widening of the approach roadways to match the proposed bridge geometry; hydroseeding the extent of the disturbed area to reduce embankment fill erosion.
- Contact Information
-
James Herota
Central Valley Flood Protection Board
Lead/Public Agency
3310 El Camino Avenue, Suite 170
Sacramento, CA 95821
Phone : (916) 574-0651
james.herota@cvflood.ca.gov -
Glenn County
Project Applicant
Location
- Cities
- Afton
- Counties
- Glenn
- Waterways
- Butte Basin
- Other Location Info
- 3.5 miles east of Afton, on County Rd. 67, in Area E of the Butte Basin, Glenn County.
Notice of Determination
- Approving Agency
- Central Valley Flood Protection Board
- Approving Agency Role
- Responsible Agency
- Approved On
- Final Environmental Document Available at
- Central Valley Flood Protection Board, 3310 El Camino Avenue, Suite 170, Sacramento, CA 95821
Determinations
- (1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
- No
- (2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
- No
- (2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
- Yes
- (2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
- No
- (3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
- Yes
- (4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
- Yes
- (5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
- No
- (6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
- Yes