RSL Operating, Inc., Wood Grinding Facility

3 Documents in Project

Summary

SCH Number
2015122011
Lead Agency
Stockton, Port of (Port of Stockton)
Document Title
RSL Operating, Inc., Wood Grinding Facility
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
2/2/2016
Present Land Use
Port District (PT)/Industrial Use

Document Description
The proposed project involves construction and operation of a wood grinding facility at the Port of Stockton. The facility would receive (via truck and rail) and separately process wooden railroad ties, urban green wood waste/pre-ground wood material. Both products would be sold as fuel to existing permitted facilities. A new rail spur that would connect to an existing California Traction Company rail line would be constructed. Construction activities would consist of grading and site improvements, including construction of the rail spur and specific areas designated for materials delivery and staging, materials processing, and materials transfer and load out. Construction of the proposed project is expected to begin in early 2016 and to take up to 5 weeks.

Contact Information
Jason Cashman
Port of Stockton
2201 W. Washington Street
Stockton, CA 95203

Phone : (209) 946-0246

Location

Coordinates
37°56'36"N °'"W
Cities
Stockton
Counties
San Joaquin
Cross Streets
West Washington Street and Port Road 22
Zip
95203
Total Acres
8
Parcel #
145031\012 (small piece of this parcel)
State Highways
SR-4
Railways
CCT, BNSF, UP
Waterways
San Joaquin River
Township
1N
Range
6E
Section
9
Base
1851

Notice of Determination

Approving Agency
Stockton Port District
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Final Environmental Document Available at
2201 W. Washington St, Stockton, CA 95203

Determinations

(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Download CSV New Search