Western Pacific Interceptor Canal Culvert Replacement Project (Streambed Alteration Agreement No. 1600-2018-0310-R2)
3 Documents in Project
Download CSV
New Search
Summary
- SCH Number
- 2015102075
- Lead Agency
- Central Valley Flood Protection Board
- Document Title
- Western Pacific Interceptor Canal Culvert Replacement Project (Streambed Alteration Agreement No. 1600-2018-0310-R2)
- Document Type
- NOD - Notice of Determination
- Received
- Document Description
- The project is limited to the removal and replacement of a failed drainage culvert on the eastern embankment of the WPIC. The culvert has a corroded inlet that has collapsed, sinkhole existing in the embankment near the damaged culvert, and the culvert is not conveying water adequately. Approx. 60 linear feet of 23-inch diameter corrugated metal pipe will be removed and replaced with approx. 60 feet of 24-inch diameter reinforced concrete pipe (RCP). An existing landside inlet structure will be removed and a landside inlet structure with a trash rack will be installed. *SEE NOD FOR FULL DETAILS
- Contact Information
-
Amy Kennedy
CDFW
1701 Nimbus Road, Suite A
Rancho Cordova, CA 95670
916.358.2842
Location
- Coordinates
- 39.027863°'"N 121.541055°'"W
- Counties
- Yolo
- Cross Streets
- Plumas Arboga Road and CA-70
- Zip
- 95961
- Total Acres
- .75
- Parcel #
- 014-400-014-000
- State Highways
- CA-70, 65
- Railways
- UPRR
- Schools
- Rio Del Oro ES
- Waterways
- Feather River
- Township
- 14N
- Range
- 4E
- Section
- 28
- Other Location Info
- Plumas Lake
Notice of Determination
- Approving Agency
- CDFW
- Approving Agency Role
- Responsible Agency
- Approved On
- Final EIR Available Location
- 1701 Nimbus Road, Rancho Cordova, CA 95670
Determinations
- (1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
- No
- (2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
- No
- (2b) A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
- Yes
- (3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
- Yes
- (4) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
- No
- (5) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
- No