Niles Canyon Safety Improvements Project (EA 2A332)
5 Documents in Project
Download CSV
New Search
Summary
- SCH Number
- 2015092075
- Lead Agency
- Caltrans 4 (Oakland) (California Department of Transportation, District 4)
- Document Title
- Niles Canyon Safety Improvements Project (EA 2A332)
- Document Type
- NOD - Notice of Determination
- Received
- Document Description
- Caltrans proposes to construct multiple safety improvements at specific site locations along the SR 84 corridor between SR 238 (Mission Blvd) and the SR 84/I-680 Separation. The project alternative developed to meet the purpose and need of the project is the Build Alternative. Improvements of the Build Alternative include fixed object removal and relocation, the installation of rock drapery systems, limited shoulder widening, widening and barrier replacement on Alameda Creek Bridge and Overhead (bridge 33-0039), and the signalization of the Pleasanton-Sunol Road / SR 84 intersection.
- Contact Information
-
Brian Gassner
California Department of Transportation, District 4
111 Grand Avenue MS 8B
Oakland, CA 94612
510-286-6025
Location
- Cities
- Fremont
- Counties
- Alameda
- Cross Streets
- Mission Boulevard (SR 238) and I-680
- Zip
- 94536
- State Highways
- SR 84 and I-680
- Railways
- Niles Canyon Railway
- Schools
- Sunol Glen ES
- Waterways
- Alameda Creek
- Other Location Info
- Niles and Sunol
Notice of Determination
- Approving Agency
- Caltrans
- Approving Agency Role
- Lead Agency
- Approved On
- Final EIR Available Location
- http://www.dot.ca.gov/d4/envdocs.htm
Determinations
- (1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
- Yes
- (2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
- Yes
- (2b) A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
- No
- (3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
- Yes
- (4) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
- Yes
- (5) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
- Yes