Addendum No. 3 to the Mitigated Negative Declaration for Jurupa Community Services District Recycled Water Expansion (District Project No. C133656)

14 Documents in Project

Summary

SCH Number
2015071073
Lead Agency
Jurupa Community Services District
Document Title
Addendum No. 3 to the Mitigated Negative Declaration for Jurupa Community Services District Recycled Water Expansion (District Project No. C133656)
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
8/16/2018
Present Land Use
Primarily roadway rights-of-way; other land use designations and zoning are residential, commercial, agricultural
Document Description
The extension of a recylced water pipeline proposed from Bellegrave Ave to Hamner Ave to a point of connection approximately 1,800 feet to the north. The maximum extent of ground distrubance for the will consist of trenching operations required for pipeline installation within the existing paved roadway. The estimated pipeline right of way is expected to measure no more than four feet wide and eight feet deep. This pipeline extension will provide a second point of connection to the City of Ontario's recycled water infrastructure for system reliability and redundancy.

Contact Information

Name
Todd M. Corbin
Agency Name
Jurupa Community Services District
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency

Location

Cities
Chino, Eastvale, Jurupa Valley, Ontario
Counties
Riverside, San Bernardino
Parcel #
Various
State Highways
I-15; SR-60
Airports
Chino
Schools
Various
Waterways
Santa Ana River
Township
2/3S
Range
6/7W
Section
Varies
Base
SBB&M

Notice of Determination

Approving Agency
Jurupa Community Services District
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On

Determinations

(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes

Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.

Download CSV New Search Print