Highway 395 Widening EA ON971 Project (California Endangered Species Act Incidental Take Permit No. 2081-2016-061-06 (ITP))
6 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2015041032
Lead Agency
California Department of Transportation, District 8
Document Title
Highway 395 Widening EA ON971 Project (California Endangered Species Act Incidental Take Permit No. 2081-2016-061-06 (ITP))
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
5/10/2017
Document Description
The proposed project involves construction of a four-foot (4') median buffer and widening the existing shoulder to eight feet which includes extending culverts and wing walls from approx. 6.9 miles south of Kramer Junction on US-395 to US-58 PM 39 to PM 45.9.
The Project will result in permanent impacts to 82.9 acres of Desert tortoise (Gopherus agassizii) and Mohave ground squirrel (Xerospermophilus mohavensis) habitat; The project is expected to result in incidental take of desert tortoise and Mohave ground squirrel, which are designated as a threatened species under the CA Endangered Species Act. The ITP referenced above as issued by CDFW authorizes incidental take of species listed under CESA that may occur as a result of Project implementation.
Contact Information
Name
Heather Elder
Agency Name
CDFW
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Coordinates
Counties
San Bernardino
Cross Streets
US 395 at SR 58
Zip
93516
Total Acres
37
State Highways
Hwy 395, 58
Railways
BNSF
Township
10N
Range
6W
Section
20
Other Location Info
Kramer Junction
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
CDFW
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.