Removal Action Workplan, Martinez Unified School District
2 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2015039026
Lead Agency
Martinez Unified School District
Document Title
Removal Action Workplan, Martinez Unified School District
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
7/23/2015
Document Description
The project consists of approval by the DTSC of a Removal Action Workplan (RAW) submitted by Terraphase Engineering on behalf of the Martinez Unified School District (MUSD) on March 20, 2015. DTSC's approval action is being undertaken pursuant to the regulatory authority granted under Chp 6.8, Division 20 of the Health and Safety Code. The purpose of the RAW, which constitutes the project subject to approval by the DTSC, is to mitigate potential risk to human health and the environment by the excavation and off-site disposal of soil containing concentrations of lead that exceed the unrestricted land use cleanup goal.
The MUSD prepared an IS/MND for the Vicente Martinez Continuation High School & Briones Alternative School construction project and approved the school construction project on March 24, 2015. The RAW is a smaller component of the larger school construction project, and the IS/MND includes the RAW activities and mitigation measures that are applicable to the RAW.
Contact Information
Name
Harold Duke
Agency Name
DTSC
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Cities
Martinez
Counties
Contra Costa
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
DTSC
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.