Del Puerto Creek Sediment Removal Project
5 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2015032042
Lead Agency
California Department of Water Resources
(DWR)
Document Title
Del Puerto Creek Sediment Removal Project
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
4/29/2015
Present Land Use
State property (water conveyance system): Grazed land. Adjacent to agricultural zone
Document Description
The proposed project includes actions to restore channel flow capacity within Del Puerto Creek, and to forestall potential damages to the California Aqueduct levee. These actions include the removal of silt/cobble within 200 feet upstream of where Del Puerto Creek crosses under the Aqueduct, returning the drainage to tis intended condition; placement of rip-rap along both sides of the creek embankments to stabilize the banks and prevent erosion of the Aqueduct levee; repairing a rocked drainage ditch that channels water runoff from the Aqueduct levee directly to the creek bed, improving the flow of water away from the levee toe; and access road improvements.
Contact Information
Name
Gerald Snow
Agency Name
CA Dept of Water Resources
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Coordinates
Cities
Patterson
Counties
Stanislaus
Cross Streets
Hwy 5 and Sperry Ave
Zip
95363
Total Acres
1.8
Parcel #
Various
State Highways
Hwy 5
Waterways
California Aqueduct
Township
5S
Range
7E
Section
21
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
CA Dept of Water Resources
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.