Port of San Diego Microgrid- Resiliency in Terminal Operations
8 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2015031046
Lead Agency
San Diego Unified Port District
Document Title
Port of San Diego Microgrid- Resiliency in Terminal Operations
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
5/18/2018
Present Land Use
Port Master Plan designates the 96-acre area as either Marine Terminal or Marine Related.
Document Description
The San Diego Unified Port District proposes to develop a renewable-based microgrid at its Tenth Avenue Marine Terminal that can be replicated at other seaport terminals and industrial facilities. The project will incorporate a 700-kilowatt (kW) solar array. 700-kW/2,500-kilowatt hour lithium ion battery storage system, and a centralized microgrid control system to allow key elements of the terminal to remain operational when islanded from the grid. High mast terminal lighting will be converted to light emitting diode fixtures to improve energy efficiency. The microgrid storage and controls will provide islanding and demand response benefits, allowing the District to reduce loads.
Contact Information
Name
Kenneth Schumann
Agency Name
CA Energy Commission
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Coordinates
Cities
San Diego
Counties
San Diego
Cross Streets
Harbor Drive and Cesar Chavez Parkway (687 Switzer Street)
Zip
92101
Total Acres
96
Parcel #
020-183; 020-091; 020-025; 020-039
State Highways
I-5
Railways
BNSF
Schools
Perkins Elementary
Waterways
San Diego Bay
Other Location Info
Barrio Logan
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
CA Energy Commission
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
Yes
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
Yes
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.