City of Santa Clara Lawrence Station Area Plan (LSAP)
4 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2015022059
Lead Agency
City of Santa Clara
Document Title
City of Santa Clara Lawrence Station Area Plan (LSAP)
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
12/9/2016
Present Land Use
Z: Light Industrial (ML)-light manufacturing
GPD: Industrial
Document Description
The EIR analyzed construction of up to 3,500 residential units, up to approx. 104,000 sq. ft. of commercial space, approx. 6 acres of parks/open space, and related infrastructure and roadway improvements. Area bounded by Lawrence Expressway to the west, Central Expressway to the north, Kifer Road to the south and Calabasas Creek to east (Assessor parcels identified in Book 216 Page 34, and a portion in Book 216 Page 33). Approvals on Nov. 29, 2016 include Specific Plan, General Plan Amendments, Zoning for the LSAP and projects located at 3305 Kifer Road (True Life), and 3505 Kifer Road, et al (Summer Hill).
Contact Information
Name
John Davidson
Agency Name
City of Santa Clara
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Coordinates
Cities
Santa Clara
Counties
Santa Clara
Cross Streets
Lawrence Expressway and Central Expressway
Zip
95051
Total Acres
65
Parcel #
pgs 216-33, 216-34
State Highways
82, 237
Railways
UPRR
Airports
Moffett
Schools
Wilcox, Mission College
Waterways
Calabazas Creek, San Tomas Aquino Creek
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
City of Santa Clara
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
Yes
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
Yes
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.