Smith River Curve Improvement Project

4 Documents in Project

Summary

SCH Number
2015012022
Lead Agency
California Department of Transportation, District 1
Document Title
Smith River Curve Improvement Project
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
5/26/2015
Document Description
The proposed project would widen a portion of the roadway to improve safety at a nonstandard curve location from post mile 8.2 to 8.3. The improvement at this curve location would create a facility with two 12-foot lanes and 8 foot shoulders by realigning the roadway, and constructing a 22-foot wide, approximately 220-foot-long side-hill viaduct to support the curve widening. The widening would occur primarily on the northbound lane of the roadway to reduce the extent of cutting the steep slope adjacent to the existing roadway. The viaduct foundation would be constructed of cast-in-drilled-hole (CIDH) piles that would be installed into rock at each bent and abutment. A total of 16 piles would be installed. No portion of the proposed structure would be located in or extend over the river.

Contact Information

Name
Wesley Stroud
Agency Name
California Department of Transportation, District 1
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency

Location

Cities
Crescent City
Counties
Del Norte
Cross Streets
US Route 199 at post mile 8.0/8.5
Zip
95531
State Highways
US 199
Waterways
Smith River

Notice of Determination

Approving Agency
Caltrans District 1
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On

Determinations

(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
No
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No

Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.

Download CSV New Search Print