Santa Fe Avenue Bridge Replacement Project (California Endangered Species Act Incidental Take Permit No. 2081-2015-028-04 (ITP))

3 Documents in Project

Summary

SCH Number
2015011045
Lead Agency
Merced County
Document Title
Santa Fe Avenue Bridge Replacement Project (California Endangered Species Act Incidental Take Permit No. 2081-2015-028-04 (ITP))
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received

Document Description
The Project consists of the demolition and replacement of the existing, structurally deficient two span timber stringer bridge (Bridge No. 30C0110) over Deadman Creek with a new bridge that will be wider, satisfy current design standards, and capable of carrying current legal vehicular loads. The Project will result in impacts to 1.31 acres of California tiger salamander upland aestivation habitat including temporary impacts to 1.21 acres; the project will permanently remove 0.10 acres of CTS upland aestivation habitat. The project is expected to result in incidental take of CTS, which is designated as a threatened species under the California Endangered Species Act. The ITP referenced above as issued by CDFW authorizes incidental take of species listed under CESA that may occur as a result of project implementation.

Contact Information
Jim Vang
CDFW Central Region
1234 East Shaw Avenue
Fresno, CA 93710

559-243-4014 x254

Location

Coordinates
37°12'35.22"N 120°13'21.72"W
Counties
Merced
Cross Streets
South Santa Fe Avenue and South Ipsen Avenue
Zip
95333
Total Acres
2.46
Parcel #
068-120-032
Railways
ATSF
Schools
Le Grand Union ES, HS
Waterways
Deadman Creek, Dutchman Creek, Hadley Lateral
Township
8S
Range
16E
Section
28
Other Location Info
Le Grand

Notice of Determination

Approving Agency
CDFW
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Final EIR Available Location
CDFW Region 4, 1234 East Shaw Avenue, Fresno, CA 93710

Determinations

(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(5) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
Download CSV New Search