Streambed Alteration Agreement (Agreement) No. 1600-2016-0443-R1, Mendocino County Department of Transportation, Pedestrian Bridge Replacement Project, Ten Mile
3 Documents in Project
Download CSV
New Search
Summary
- SCH Number
- 2014112028
- Lead Agency
- Mendocino County
- Document Title
- Streambed Alteration Agreement (Agreement) No. 1600-2016-0443-R1, Mendocino County Department of Transportation, Pedestrian Bridge Replacement Project, Ten Mile
- Document Type
- NOD - Notice of Determination
- Received
- Document Description
- CDFW is issuing an Agreement for replacement of a degraded pedestrian bridge attached to an existing vehicular bridge. The existing vehicular bridge is not scheduled for replacement. The replacement pedestrian bridge will use a full-span, pre-fabricated steel truss structure, which will measure 10-ft. wide, and 120-ft. in length. Each end of the bridge will be supported by a concrete pile cap abutment constructed over the top of three steel H-piles or pipe piles. Piles will be driven with vibratory equipment to reduce noise.
- Contact Information
-
Wes Stokes
CDFW
601 Locust Street
Redding, CA 96001
707-799-7106
Location
- Coordinates
- 39°41'16"N 123°29'31"W
- Counties
- Mendocino
- Cross Streets
- US Highway 101 and Branscomb Road
- Zip
- 95454
- Total Acres
- .8
- Parcel #
- 014-060-05, 35, 36
- State Highways
- Hwy 101
- Schools
- Laytonville High
- Waterways
- Ten Mile Creek
- Township
- 21N
- Range
- 15W
- Section
- 12
- Base
- MDB&M
- Other Location Info
- Laytonville
Notice of Determination
- Approving Agency
- CDFW
- Approving Agency Role
- Responsible Agency
- Approved On
- Final EIR Available Location
- 601 Lcoust Street, Redding, CA 96001
Determinations
- (1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
- No
- (2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
- No
- (2b) A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
- Yes
- (3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
- Yes
- (4) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
- No
- (5) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
- Yes