Banducci Substation Project

2 Documents in Project

Summary

SCH Number
2014111032
Lead Agency
Public Utilities Commission (California Public Utilities Commission)
Document Title
Banducci Substation Project
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
6/17/2015
Present Land Use
Rural/A / Intensive Agriculture

Document Description
SCE's application to construct the Banducci Substation Project includes the following components: (1) new Banducci 66/12 kilovolt (kV) Substation, located at the southeast corner of Peliser Road and unimproved Dale Road in unincorporated Cummings Valley; (2) two new 66 kV subtransmission lines segments that would loop into the existing Correction-Cummings-Kern River #1 66 kV subtransmission line; (3) three new underground 12 kV distribution getaways; and (4) 32 miles of overhead and underground telecommunication facilities to connect the proposed Banducci Substation to SCE's existing telecommunications system near the City of Tehachapi.

Contact Information
Jensen Uchida
California Public Utilities Commission
505 Van Ness Avenue
San Francisco, CA 94102

Phone : (415) 703-5484

Location

Coordinates
35°6'5.7"N 118°36'6.4"W
Cities
Tehachapi
Counties
Kern
Cross Streets
Pelliser Road + Dale Road and surrounding area
Zip
93561
Total Acres
6.3
Parcel #
448-052-12
State Highways
SR-58
Railways
UPRR
Airports
Psk Ranch
Schools
Monroe HS
Township
32S
Range
31E
Section
36
Base
MDB&M

Notice of Determination

Approving Agency
California Public Utilities Commission
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Final Environmental Document Available at
CPUC Energy Division, 505 Van Ness Avenue, 3rd Floor, San Francisco, CA 94102

Determinations

(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Download CSV New Search