Childs Meadows Head Cut Stabilization and Repair Project

2 Documents in Project

Summary

SCH Number
2014102058
Lead Agency
Tehama County
Document Title
Childs Meadows Head Cut Stabilization and Repair Project
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received

Document Description
The project proposes to construct bio-engineered erosion stabilization infrastructure at a head cut along Gumsey Creek within the Childs Meadows complex. The head cut control structure is designed to provide maximum assurance that the head cut will be arrested in place while providing an esthetically pleasing, biotechnical component that is consistent with existing conditions in the Childs Meadow area. The grade control structure will include 4 design elements: (1) a vegetated rock grade control structure, (2) several rootwad revetments, (3) Live fascine willow plantings, and (4) log cored willow baffles. In order to reduce the potential for the proposed head cut infrastructure to be flanked by stream channel moment, additional log cored baffles outside the immediate head cut area will be installed to deflect flow into the current channel along those flow paths where flanking is most likely to occur.

Contact Information
Tom McCubbins
Resource Conservation District of Tehama County
2 Sutter Street, Suite D
Red Bluff, CA 96080

530-527-3013 x120

Location

Coordinates
40°20'54"N 121°21'0"W
Cities
Mineral
Counties
Tehama
Cross Streets
SR 36E / 89 and SR 32E
Zip
96063
Total Acres
1.5
Parcel #
015-100-45-1
State Highways
SR 36E
Waterways
Gurnsey Creek & Mirror Tributary
Township
29N
Range
4E
Section
25
Base
MDB&M

Notice of Determination

Approving Agency
Resource Conservation District of Tehama County
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Final EIR Available Location
Tehama County Clerk Recorders Office, 633 Washington Street Red Bluff, CA 96080

Determinations

(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(5) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Download CSV New Search