Greenwood Culvert Replacement Project [California Endangered Species Act (CESA) Incidental Take Permit No. 2081-2014-071-03 Minor Amendment (ITP)]
5 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2014102037
Lead Agency
Napa County
Document Title
Greenwood Culvert Replacement Project [California Endangered Species Act (CESA) Incidental Take Permit No. 2081-2014-071-03 Minor Amendment (ITP)]
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
11/6/2015
Present Land Use
GP: Agricultural Resource (Agricultural Preserve)
Z: Agricultural Preserve north of site
Document Description
The project includes removing a failed culvert crossing, installing a roughened channel fish passage structure, enhancing riparian vegetation, and installing California freshwater shrimp habitat structures.
The project will result in impacts to California freshwater shrimp habitat including temporary impacts to 9,000 sf; the project will permanently remove 17 linear ft of California freshwater shrimp habitat. The project is expected to result in incidental take of California freshwater shrimp, which is designated as an endangered species under CESA. The ITP referenced above as issued by CDFW authorizes incidental take of species listed under CESA that may occur as a result of project implementation.
Contact Information
Name
Suzanne Gilmore
Agency Name
CDFW Bay Delta Region
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Cities
Calistoga
Counties
Napa
Cross Streets
Greenwood Ave at intersection with Napa River
Parcel #
017-210-014
State Highways
Hwy 29
Waterways
Napa River
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
CDFW
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.