Airport Land Use Commission Application No. PLN2013-0091 - Crows Landing Industrial Business Park Specific Plan and Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan Update

5 Documents in Project

Summary

SCH Number
2014102035
Lead Agency
Stanislaus County
Document Title
Airport Land Use Commission Application No. PLN2013-0091 - Crows Landing Industrial Business Park Specific Plan and Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan Update
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received

Document Description
Request to determine the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) adquately provided environmental analysis to support the proposed amendment to the Stanislaus County Airport Land Use Compatbility Plan (ALUCP); consider adoption of an amendment to the Stanislaus County ALUCP to include airport-specific compatibility policies for the proposed general aviation airport at the Crows Landing Industrial Business Park; and make a determination regarding the consistency of the proposed CLIBP Specific Plan with the amended and adopted ALUCP. Note: See NOD for full project description

Contact Information
Rachel Wyse
Stanislaus County
1010 10th Street, Sixth Floor
Modesto, CA 95354

(209) 525-6330
boggsk@stancounty.com

Location

Coordinates
37°24'31.5"N 121°06'32.1"W
Cities
Patterson
Counties
Stanislaus
Cross Streets
West Marshall Rd to the north, Fink Rd to the south, Bell Rd to the east and Davis Rd
Zip
95313
Total Acres
1,528
Parcel #
027-003-074 to 080;027-001-057,-058,-059
State Highways
I-5
Railways
CA No. Railroad Co.
Schools
Bonita ES
Waterways
Delta-Mendota Canal, CA Aqueduct
Other Information
Patterson City limits

Notice of Determination

Approving Agency
Stanislaus County Airport Land Use Commission
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Final EIR Available Location
1010 10th Street, Suite 3400, Modesto, CA 95354

Determinations

(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
Yes
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
Yes
(5) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Download CSV New Search