Monge Ranch Road Replacement (Streambed Alteration Agreement No. 1600-2020-0069-R2)
4 Documents in Project
Download CSV
New Search
Print
Summary
- SCH Number
- 2014092018
- Lead Agency
- Calaveras County
- Document Title
- Monge Ranch Road Replacement (Streambed Alteration Agreement No. 1600-2020-0069-R2)
- Document Type
- NOD - Notice of Determination
- Received
- Posted
- 12/10/2020
- Project Applicant
- Calaveras County Department of Public Works
- Document Description
- The project is limited to replacement of the Monge Ranch Road Bridge (Bridge Number 30C 0021) over Coyote Creek, the relocation of existing utility poles and waterlines, and to improve the roadway approaches on either side of the bridge.
- Contact Information
-
Michael Shun
California Department of Fish and Wildlife
1701 Nimbus Road
Rancho Cordova, CA 95670
Phone : (916) 358-2384
michael.shun@wildlife.ca.gov
Location
- Coordinates
- 38°6'49.7"N 120°27'11.2"W
- Counties
- Calaveras
- Regions
- Northern California
- Waterways
- unnamed tributary to Coyote Creek
- Township
- 3N
- Range
- 14E
- Section
- 17
- Base
- MDM
Notice of Determination
- Approving Agency
- California Department of Fish and Wildlife
- Approving Agency Role
- Responsible Agency
- Approved On
- Final Environmental Document Available at
- at the office location listed above for the Lead Agency. CDFW’s record of project approval as Responsible Agency is available at CDFW’s regional office
Determinations
- (1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
- No
- (2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
- No
- (2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
- Yes
- (2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
- No
- (3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
- Yes
- (4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
- Yes
- (5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
- No
- (6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
- No