PG&E Gas Transmission Line 123 Pipeline Replacement Project, Phase 2 Sections 2B2, 1C, 2C1, and 2C2

3 Documents in Project

Summary

SCH Number
2014092007
Lead Agency
Regional Water Quality Control Board, Region 5 (Central Valley), Sacramento
Document Title
PG&E Gas Transmission Line 123 Pipeline Replacement Project, Phase 2 Sections 2B2, 1C, 2C1, and 2C2
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
10/8/2014
Present Land Use
Industrial Park; Industrial; Open Space/Agriculture 20-acre minimum; Industrial/Open Space; Low Density Residential
Document Description
The Gas Transmission Line 123 Pipeline Replacement Project, Phase 2 -Section 2B2, 1C, 2C1, and 2C2 Project consists of replacing four segments of a 0.85-mile long, 12-inch diameter natural gas pipeline with a 16-inch diameter pipeline and replacing an existing underground vault.

Contact Information

Name
Trevor Cleak
Agency Name
Regional Water Quality Control Board, Region 5 (Central Valley),
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency

Location

Cities
Lincoln
Counties
Placer
Cross Streets
Langton Ct/Forebridge Ln (2C2, Athens Ave/Thunder Valley Court (2C1, 1C, and 2B2)
Zip
95648
Total Acres
11.21
Parcel #
021-283-010, 021-283-026, 021-282
State Highways
Hwy 65
Railways
UPRR
Schools
Lincoln Crossing Element
Waterways
Orchard Creek, scattered wetland complexes
Township
11N
Range
6E
Section
4/9

Notice of Determination

Approving Agency
Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On

Determinations

(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes

Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.

Download CSV New Search Print