Site Access Agreements for Two Sites for the LA-RICS Land Mobile Radio (LMR) Project
29 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2014081025
Lead Agency
United States Air Force
(USAF)
Document Title
Site Access Agreements for Two Sites for the LA-RICS Land Mobile Radio (LMR) Project
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
9/19/2016
Present Land Use
Department of Defense military installation
Document Description
Site Access Agreements at Site MMC (listed on Attachment 1) allows for implementation of the LMR System, which consists of installation of antennas on new 150' to 180' lattice towers and supporting radio equipment in new shelters at sites within the County of LA. The environmental impacts of project implementation at these sites was evaluated in an EIR certified by the LA-RICS JPA Board on March 29, 2016. On 4/12/2016 the County, acting as responsible agency, considered the EIR, adopted the MMP and findings when it considered the SAA for two other sites. There have been no changes tot eh project or to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken since that approval that would require new analysis or mitigation under CEQA.
Contact Information
Name
Chris Montana
Agency Name
County of Los Angeles
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Coordinates
Cities
Lompoc
Counties
Santa Barbara
Zip
93436
Total Acres
13.2
State Highways
No
Railways
UPRR
Airports
No
Waterways
Honda Creek
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
County of LA
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
Yes
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
Yes
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.