Orange County Feeder Relining Project
2 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2014081017
Lead Agency
Metropolitan Water District of Southern California
Document Title
Orange County Feeder Relining Project
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
11/18/2014
Present Land Use
Various - industrial, residential
Document Description
The proposed project involves relining approximately 9.5 miles of the OCF. The OCF is a welded steel pipeline, approximately 36 inches in diameter, and is lined with coal tar enamel (CTE) to protect the inside of the pipeline. The CTE liner is blistering or peeling away from the internal steel face of the pipeline and exposing the pipeline to corrosion. The proposed project includes removal of the existing CTE liner, relining the pipeline with cement mortar, and installing bonding bars between the pipe sections to enable the installation of an effective cathodic protection system for corrosion prevention. Maintenance and replacement of worn or outdated components (e.g. above-ground air release valves, vacuum valves) would also be completed as part of this project.
Contact Information
Name
Brenda Marines
Agency Name
Metropolitan Water District of Southern California
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Coordinates
Cities
Costa Mesa, Newport Beach, Santa Ana
Counties
Orange
Cross Streets
Bristol Street, Jamboree Avenue
Zip
92701
Parcel #
various
State Highways
Hwy 22, 5, 55, 405, 73
Railways
Metrolink
Airports
John Wayne Int'l
Schools
Various
Waterways
Newport Bay, San Diego Creek
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
Metropolitan Water District of Southern California
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.