State Route 120/McKinley Avenue Interchange Project
5 Documents in Project
Download CSV
New Search
Print
Summary
- SCH Number
- 2014072073
- Lead Agency
- California Department of Transportation, District 10 (DOT)
- Document Title
- State Route 120/McKinley Avenue Interchange Project
- Document Type
- NOD - Notice of Determination
- Received
- Posted
- 2/23/2021
- Document Description
- The proposed Project would construct a new interchange on SR 120 at McKinley Avenue and would include improvements to SR 120 and McKinley Avenue. The interchange would be a Type L-9 partial cloverleaf interchange that would provide loop on-ramps in addition to four diamond-type entrance and exit ramps. SR 120 improvements include a 2,000 foot long axillary lane on the westbound side between Airport Way and McKinley Avenue as well as a 368-foot long deceleration lane in the eastbound direction. Improvements to McKinley Avenue include development of seven lanes passing under SR 120, a high-occupancy vehicle only right-turn lanes at the westbound ramps intersection, and a 10-foot wide Class I bike lane/pedestrian walkway on the east side of McKinley Avenue
- Contact Information
-
Nicholas White
Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board
Responsible Agency
11020 Sun Center Dr. Ste. 200
Rancho Cordova, CA 95670
Phone : (916) 464-4856
Nicholas.white@waterboards.ca.gov
Location
- Coordinates
- 37°47'6.3"N 121°16'11.3"W
- Cities
- Manteca
- Counties
- San Joaquin
- Township
- 2South
- Range
- 6East
- Section
- 1&2
- Base
- MDB&M
Notice of Determination
- Approving Agency
- Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board
- Approving Agency Role
- Responsible Agency
- Approved On
- Final Environmental Document Available at
- 1976 E. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd. Stockton, CA 95205
Determinations
- (1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
- No
- (2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
- No
- (2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
- Yes
- (2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
- No
- (3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
- Yes
- (4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
- Yes
- (5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
- No
- (6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
- Yes