State Route 120/McKinley Avenue Interchange Project
5 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2014072073
Lead Agency
California Department of Transportation, District 10
(DOT)
Document Title
State Route 120/McKinley Avenue Interchange Project
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
2/23/2021
Document Description
The proposed Project would construct a new interchange on SR 120 at McKinley Avenue and would include improvements to SR 120 and McKinley Avenue. The interchange would be a Type L-9 partial cloverleaf interchange that would provide loop on-ramps in addition to four diamond-type entrance and exit ramps. SR 120 improvements include a 2,000 foot long axillary lane on the westbound side between Airport Way and McKinley Avenue as well as a 368-foot long deceleration lane in the eastbound direction. Improvements to McKinley Avenue include development of seven lanes passing under SR 120, a high-occupancy vehicle only right-turn lanes at the westbound ramps intersection, and a 10-foot wide Class I bike lane/pedestrian walkway on the east side of McKinley Avenue
Contact Information
Name
Nicholas White
Agency Name
Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board
Contact Types
Responsible Agency
Phone
Location
Coordinates
Cities
Manteca
Counties
San Joaquin
Township
2South
Range
6East
Section
1&2
Base
MDB&M
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
Yes
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes