EIR for General Waste Discharge Requirements for Vineyard Properties in Napa River and Sonoma

3 Documents in Project

Summary

SCH Number
2014072013
Lead Agency
Regional Water Quality Control Board, Region 2 (San Francisco Bay), Oakland
Document Title
EIR for General Waste Discharge Requirements for Vineyard Properties in Napa River and Sonoma
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
7/27/2017
Present Land Use
Mainly Agriculturally Zoned Land
Document Description
The proposed General Permit is to reduce the discharge of sediment, storm runoff, and other pollutants from vineyard properties in the Napa River and Sonoma Creek watersheds. The General Permit requires implementation of management actions to control sediment discharges and storm runoff increases from farms and roads, and also to control pesticide and nutrient discharges from farms, in order to comply with water quality requirements.

Contact Information

Name
James Ponton
Agency Name
Regional Water Quality Control Board, Region 2 (San Francisco Ba
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency

Location

Cities
American Canyon, Calistoga, Napa, Napa, St. Helena, Yountville, Calistoga, American Canyon, ..., St. Helena, Vallejo, Yountville
Counties
Napa, Sonoma
Parcel #
various
Other Location Info
Glen Ellen, Rutherford, Angwin, Deer Park

Notice of Determination

Approving Agency
SF Bay RWQCB
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On

Determinations

(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
Yes
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
Yes
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes

Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.

Download CSV New Search Print