Lower Mokelumne River Spawning and Rearing Habitat Improvement Project (Streambed Alteration Agreement No. 1600-2019-0051-R2)

SCH Number: 2014062077
Lead Agency: East Bay Municipal Utility District
Document Title: Lower Mokelumne River Spawning and Rearing Habitat Improvement Project (Streambed Alteration Agreement No. 1600-2019-0051-R2)
Document Type: NOD - Notice of Determination
Received: 7/30/2019
Posted: 7/30/2019

Document Description: The California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) has executed Streambed Alteration Agreement number 1600-2019-0051-R2, pursuant to section 1602 of the Fish and Game Code to the project Applicant, East Bay Municipal Utility District. The annual placement of spawning gravel in a 1-mile reach of the river, and the annual construction and/or maintenance of small 0.5 to 1-acre ephemeral floodplain habitats within the historic floodplain of the Mokelumne River Day Use Area.

Contact Information: Kyle Stoner
Department of Fish and Wildlife North Central Region
1701 Nimbus Road
Rancho Cordova, CA 95670
Phone : (916) 767-8178

Counties: San Joaquin
Other Location Info: The project is located on the Mokelumne River within the Mokelumne River Day Use Area (MRDUA), on EBMUD property just below Camanche Dam and adjacent to the Mokelumne River Fish Hatchery, in the County of San Joaquin, State of California.

Final Environmental Document Available at: Available to the general public at the office location listed above for the Lead Agency. CDFW's record of project approval as Responsible Agency is available at CDFW's regional office.

(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment: No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA: No
(2b) A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA: Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA: No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project: Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project: N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project: No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA: No