SR Truck Lane (Streambed Alteration Agreement No. 1600-2018-0059-R6)

6 Documents in Project

Summary

SCH Number
2014061054
Lead Agency
Caltrans 8 (San Bernardino) (California Department of Transportation, District 8)
Document Title
SR Truck Lane (Streambed Alteration Agreement No. 1600-2018-0059-R6)
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
8/10/2018
Present Land Use
highway

Document Description
The Project will consist of the construction of a truck climbing lane in the east bound direction, and a truck descending lane in the west bound direction of SR 60 between PM 22.2 (Gilman Springs Road) to PM 26.5. The Project will impact features subject to Fish and Game Code section 1602 that drain into the San Timoteo Creek within the San Jacinto River watershed by filling/excavating soil, extending culverts, adding reinforced concrete arches and reinforced steel pipes, removing/adding headwalls, adding grouted metal pipe at inlets, and making wildlife crossing by cutting and contouring land and constructing a new drainage system. The construction of the Project will permanently impact 0.52 acres of Fish and Game Code section 1602 resources.

Contact Information
Kim Romich
CDFW
3602 Inland Empire Blvd., Suite C-220
Ontario, CA 91764

Phone : (909) 980-3818

Location

Cities
Beaumont Moreno Valley
Counties
Riverside
Cross Streets
SR-60, Gilman Springs Road, Jack Rabbit Trail Rd
Zip
92555
Parcel #
Various
State Highways
SR-60
Railways
UPRR
Waterways
San Timoteo Creek
Township
3
Range
2W
Section
2-6

Notice of Determination

Approving Agency
CDFW
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Final EIR Available Location
3602 Inland Empire Blvd., Suite c-220, Ontario, CA 91764

Determinations

(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(5) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
Download CSV New Search