Siemens' Energy Savings Performance Contract Project (Waste-to-Energy Facility)

4 Documents in Project

Summary

SCH Number
2014061020
Lead Agency
San Bernardino County Local Enforcement Agency
Document Title
Siemens' Energy Savings Performance Contract Project (Waste-to-Energy Facility)
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
8/29/2014
Present Land Use
Industrial
Document Description
The Proposed Project would entail the construction and operation of a 34 ton per day (tpd) pyrolytic conversions system (PCS) power plant designed by Funks Engineering with a maximum energy generation capacity of 1.6 megawatts (MW) and 1,882 kilovolts (Kva). The PCS power plant, also referred to as the Waste-to-Energy (WTE) Facility, would be located on approximately 5.5 acres of currently vacant land within the Fort Irwin cantonment adjacent to the existing landfill and the MSW processing facility (Landfill Baler Building). Temporary construction staging areas would also be located within the 5.5 acres.

Contact Information

Name
Jose Rodriguez
Agency Name
San Bernardino County Local Enforcement Agency
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency

Location

Cities
Barstow
Counties
San Bernardino
Cross Streets
Sanitary Field Road and South Loop Road
Zip
92310
Total Acres
5
Airports
Bicycle Lake Army Airfield
Schools
Lewis ES
Township
14N
Range
3E
Section
33
Base
SBB&M
Other Location Info
Fort Irwin

Notice of Determination

Approving Agency
San Bernardino County Local Enforcement Agency
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On

Determinations

(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes

Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.

Download CSV New Search Print