PG&E Dalton Crossover Valve Automation Project
5 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2014052080
Lead Agency
California Department of Fish and Wildlife, Region 3
(CDFW)
Document Title
PG&E Dalton Crossover Valve Automation Project
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
6/20/2014
Present Land Use
Alameda County: Agriculture / Large Parcel Agriculture; City of Livermore: Planned Development - Open Space/Open Space - Ag
Document Description
This proposed project involves installation and expansion of gas pipeline valve automation facilities at the existing V-046 Dalton crossover station in Alameda County.
The project would temporarily disturb 2.51 acres, including ~0.012 acres of a seasonal wetland for the excavation and refilling of two sniff holes and would permanently affect 0.37 acres for the station expansion. The project is in an undeveloped parcel containing open space, and is bounded to the west by a private parcel containing a residence, pastures and livestock enclosures, and to the south by a residential neighborhood. A small portion of the project the southern sniff hole, is located within the City of Livermore. A temporary off-site workspace is located ~1.25 miles northwest of the Dalton crossover station, on the southeast corner of May School Road and Dagnino Road, north of Livermore.
Contact Information
Name
Serge Glushkoff
Agency Name
California Department of Fish and Wildlife, Region 3
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Coordinates
Cities
Livermore
Counties
Alameda
Cross Streets
Raymond Road and Ames Street
Zip
94551
Total Acres
.45
Parcel #
099B-5300-007, 099B-5300-006-04
State Highways
No
Railways
No
Airports
No
Schools
Christensen MS
Waterways
Arroyo Seco, Frick Lake
Township
2S
Range
2E
Section
26
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
CDFW
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.