City of McFarland Wastewater Treatment Plant Expansion Project
2 Documents in Project
Download CSV
New Search
Summary
- SCH Number
- 2014051073
- Lead Agency
- McFarland, City of (City of McFarland)
- Document Title
- City of McFarland Wastewater Treatment Plant Expansion Project
- Document Type
- NOD - Notice of Determination
- Received
- Posted
- 11/10/2016
- Present Land Use
- The wastewater treatment plant is designated as a Public and Institutional (PI) in the City of McFarland General Plan and zoned Heavy Industrial (M-3) by the City's zoning ordinance.
- Document Description
- The project would increase the capacity at the WWTP from 1.55 million gallons per day (mgd) to 2.5 mgd. The City proposes to convert the existing treatment process from aerated lagoons to an extended aeration-activated sludge process. The project would replace the existing dual headworks with a single headworks (with lift pump) and construct two new secondary clarifiers, a new return activated sludge (RAS) and waste activated sludge (WAS) pump station, and a new effluent pump station. Lagoons 3 and I-A would be converted into sludge drying beds.
- Contact Information
-
Mario Gonzales
City of McFarland
401 West Kern Avenue
McFarland, CA 93250
Phone : (661) 792-3091
Location
- Coordinates
- 35°40'"N 119°16'40"W
- Cities
- McFarland
- Counties
- Kern
- Cross Streets
- Melcher Avenue between Sherwood Road and Elmo Highway
- Zip
- 93250
- Total Acres
- 80
- Parcel #
- 060-050-24
- State Highways
- No
- Railways
- No
- Airports
- No
- Schools
- No
- Waterways
- No
- Township
- 26S
- Range
- 25E
- Section
- 9
- Base
- MDB&M
Notice of Determination
- Approving Agency
- City of McFarland
- Approving Agency Role
- Lead Agency
- Approved On
- Final EIR Available Location
- 401 West Kern Ave., McFarland, CA 93250
Determinations
- (1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
- No
- (2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
- No
- (2b) A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
- Yes
- (3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
- N/A
- (4) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
- No
- (5) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
- No