Leona Heights Sulfur Mine Remediation Project [California Endangered Species Act (CESA) Incidental Take Permit No. 2081-2013-070-03 (ITP)]

4 Documents in Project

Summary

SCH Number
2014042014
Lead Agency
City of Oakland
Document Title
Leona Heights Sulfur Mine Remediation Project [California Endangered Species Act (CESA) Incidental Take Permit No. 2081-2013-070-03 (ITP)]
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
6/19/2014
Present Land Use
Remediation site is within Resource Conservatioin land use. Remediation site is zoned Residential Hillside (RH-1)
Document Description
This proposed project involves remediating the waste mine tailings and stabilizing the Leona Creek channel. Project activities include grubbing and grading the entire Project site; tree removal; grading and compacting the tailings and installing a subsurface drainage system to increase stability; covering tailings with a geomembrane liner that will isolate the tailings from water; reinforcing the steep slopes adjacent to the creek channel to improve stability; and restoring the creek channel to provide for the natural transport of sediment through the creek.

Contact Information

Name
Marcia Grefsrud
Agency Name
California Department of Fish and Wildlife
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency

Location

Cities
Oakland
Counties
Alameda
Cross Streets
Mountain Boulevard / End of McDonell Avenue cul-de-sac
Zip
94605
Total Acres
1.26
Parcel #
37A-3151-2-6
State Highways
I-580/SR-13
Schools
3
Waterways
Leona Creek / Upper San Leandro Reservoir

Notice of Determination

Approving Agency
California Department of Fish and Wildlife
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On

Determinations

(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No

Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.

Download CSV New Search Print