Southern California Edison's Moorpark-Newbury 66kV Subtransmission Line Project
4 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2014031073
Lead Agency
California Public Utilities Commission
(CPUC)
Document Title
Southern California Edison's Moorpark-Newbury 66kV Subtransmission Line Project
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
8/22/2016
Present Land Use
Light Industrial (M-2), Utilities (U), Medium Industrial (I-2), Limited Industrial (M-2), Open Space, Agricultural, Public (P-L).
Document Description
Construction of a new 66kV subtransmission line and related facilities in a portion of SCE's existing Moorpark-Ormond Beach 220kV Transmission line right-of-way (ROW) and a portion of SCE's Moorpark-Newbury-Pharmacy 66kV subtransmission line ROW. The new subtransmission lie would be constructed between SCE's Moorpark Substation and Newbury Substation and includes construction of 1,200 feet of underground line, 5 mile of new 66kV line on new tubular steel poles, 2 miles of new 66kV line within the Moorpark-Newbury-Pharmacy 66kV subtransmission line, and 1 mile of new 66kV subtransmission line into Newbury Substation.
Contact Information
Name
Michael Rosauer
Agency Name
California Public Utilities Commission
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Cities
Moorpark, Thousand Oaks
Counties
Ventura
Cross Streets
Gabbert Road and Los Angeles Avenue; Lawrence Drive near Corporate Drive
Zip
93021
Parcel #
multiple
State Highways
SR 118, SR 23
Railways
UPRR
Schools
Conejo Adv., Newbury
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
CA Public Utilities Commission
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
Yes
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
Yes
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.