Interstate 40 Haller/Rojo/Clipper Valley Wash Bridges Replacements Project
4 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2014031029
Lead Agency
California Department of Transportation, District 8
Document Title
Interstate 40 Haller/Rojo/Clipper Valley Wash Bridges Replacements Project
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
5/29/2014
Present Land Use
Caltrans right of way for Interstate use
Document Description
CDFW is executing a Lake and Streambed Alteration Agreement (SAA # 1600-201-0025-R6) pursuant to Section 1602 of the Fish and Game Code to the project Applicant, California Department of Transportation, represented by Mr. Scott Quinnell, 454 West 4th Street, MS 822, San Bernardino, State of California, 92410, Phone (909) 383-6936. The Applicant is proposing to replace three bridges along Interstate 40 where it crosses over Haller Wash, Rojo Wash, and Clipper Valley Wash. Construction of the new bridges will be divided into two stages and will be required to construct a total of eight temporary detour roads in the median (four in each direction). The project will impact 5.87 acres desert wash habitat. Impacts to wash habitat will be mitigated for at a 3:1 ration. The acquired habitat should be predominately desert wash scrub.
Contact Information
Name
Rebecca Jones
Agency Name
California Department of Fish and Wildlife
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Counties
San Bernardino
Cross Streets
Nearest Road is F Road Essex
Zip
92332
State Highways
Hwy 40
Other Location Info
Essex
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
CDFW
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.