Raley's Dock Replacement and Rice Mill Pier Rehabilitation Project

8 Documents in Project

Summary

SCH Number
2014022054
Lead Agency
City of West Sacramento
Document Title
Raley's Dock Replacement and Rice Mill Pier Rehabilitation Project
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
2/23/2017
Present Land Use
RD- Recreation-Parks; RMP- Riverfront Mixed Use /RD-Recreation-Parks; RMP-Waterfront-Planned Development No 41
Document Description
Raley's Pier: Replace current dock with an overall 432-ft-long, 25-ft wide, with a 60-foot-long berthing dock downstream, and 372-ft-long upriver section. The new dock facility will meet current CA building code and safety standards and is accessible and compliant with ADA. Rice Mill Pier: Rehabilitate existing pier, substructure, abutment and piles to bring the structural and mechanical to full CA building code provisions of accessibility and compliant with ADA. Protective rail or fencing system and lighting will also be installed.

Contact Information

Name
Cristelle Erickson
Agency Name
CA Natural Resources Agency
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency

Location

Cities
West Sacramento
Counties
Yolo
Cross Streets
RD: 3rd Street and G Street; RMP: Mill Street and Riverfront Street
Zip
95691
Total Acres
.37
Parcel #
010-422-13, 058-350-06
State Highways
Hwy 80, 5
Railways
Old Sacramento
Schools
WUSD, 5 schools
Waterways
Sacramento River

Notice of Determination

Approving Agency
CA Natural Resources Agency
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On

Determinations

(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes

Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.

Download CSV New Search Print