Recycled Water Reliability Upgrades (Project);

9 Documents in Project

Summary

SCH Number
2014022013
Lead Agency
West County Wastewater District
Document Title
Recycled Water Reliability Upgrades (Project);
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
6/10/2015
Present Land Use
Various
Document Description
The proposed Project includes constructing a new aeration basin and demolishing the roughing filter to convert the existing secondary treatment process to a conventional activated sludge process. Additional modifications would increase the efficiency and capacity of the secondary treatment process. This Project would upgrade ammonia and nitrogen removal processes, thereby improving the reliability of recycled water supplies and the District's ability to meet anticipated future regulatory limitations. The Project is estimated to result in approximately 1.12 million gallons per day of additional recycled water. The Project would reduce concentrations of ammonia and nitrogen in effluent, resulting in a net benefit to effluent water quality, in comparison to existing conditions. The District-Wide Master Plan Project is a comprehensive plan for improvements that would implement over the next 20 years for rehabilitation of existing infrastructure and construction of new facilities to enhance and improve wastewater treatment operations.

Contact Information

Name
Susan L. Stewart
Agency Name
State Water Resources Control Board
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency

Location

Cities
Richmond, San Pablo
Counties
Contra Costa
Cross Streets
various
Zip
various
Total Acres
15
Parcel #
various
State Highways
I-80, Richmond Parkway
Railways
BNSF
Airports
No
Schools
various
Waterways
San Pablo, Wildcat, Pinole, Rheem & Garrity Creek
Other Location Info
El Sobrante

Notice of Determination

Approving Agency
State Water Board
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On

Determinations

(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
Yes
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes

Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.

Download CSV New Search Print