Health Care Facility Improvement Project for the North Kern State Prison, Delano, CA
2 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2013121044
Lead Agency
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
(CDCR)
Document Title
Health Care Facility Improvement Project for the North Kern State Prison, Delano, CA
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
1/22/2014
Present Land Use
Correctional Institution/Community Facilities
Document Description
The proposed project includes renovations and additions to existing health care facilities, the construction of small new facilities, and associated infrastructure improvements, all within the developed area of NKSP Improvements at the institution would include a total of 16,079 sf of renovation, 22,340 sf of new buildings or additions and 5,850 sf of additional exterior impervious surface (walkways). All construction would be consistent in character, design, and height with other existing buildings and would not exceed one story. No high-mast lighting would be installed as part of the project. The project does not include any new inmate beds. Twelve additional employees would be hired. The project would not result in expansion of the existing secure perimeter.
Contact Information
Name
Roxanne Henriquez
Agency Name
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Coordinates
Cities
Delano
Counties
Kern
Cross Streets
West Cecil Way and Lytle Avenue
Zip
93409
Total Acres
240
Schools
RFK High & Bakersfield
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitaiton
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
No
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.