MDOT Davis Creek Bridge (Lake or Streambed Alteration Agreement No. 1600-2016-0473-R1)

3 Documents in Project

Summary

SCH Number
2013112036
Lead Agency
Caltrans 1 (Eureka) (California Department of Transportation, District 1)
Document Title
MDOT Davis Creek Bridge (Lake or Streambed Alteration Agreement No. 1600-2016-0473-R1)
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received

Document Description
CDFW has executed Lake and Streambed Alteration Agreement No. 1600-20116-0473-R1, pursuant to Section 1602 of the Fish and Game Code to the project Applicant, Mendocino County Department of Transportation. Project is limited encroachment. A new bridge will be constructed beside the existing bridge, and upon completion of the new bridge, the original bridge will be removed and the banks restored. The work will require bypassing flow and creating a work platform upon approx. 140 feet of Davis Creek. New bridge abutments will be cast-in-place concrete located above the 100-year flood flow line, and the bridges itself will be cast-in-place concrete built on falsework. Rock slope protection will be placed at the toes of the abutments, but above the ordinary high water mark. The abutments, wingwalls, and a retaining wall will be founded on pile-driven steel piles. Pile driving will not occur within or immediately adjacent to the active channel.

Contact Information
Daniel Harrington
CDFW
619 2nd St.
Eureka, CA 95501

707-964-7683

Location

Coordinates
39°23'29"N 123°18'34"W
Cities
Willits
Counties
Mendocino
Cross Streets
East Hill Road at Davis Creek approximately 0.3 mile west of Eastside Road
Zip
95490
Total Acres
2.60
Parcel #
Multiple
State Highways
Hwy 20
Schools
7th Day Adventist
Township
18N
Range
13W
Section
21/28
Base
MDB&M

Notice of Determination

Approving Agency
CDFW
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Final EIR Available Location
619 2nd St., Eureka, CA 95501

Determinations

(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(5) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
Download CSV New Search