San Joaquin River Bridge Scour and Seismic Retrofit Project (Streambed Alteration Agreement No. 1600-2015-0028-R4)
7 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2013101075
Lead Agency
California Department of Transportation, District 6
Document Title
San Joaquin River Bridge Scour and Seismic Retrofit Project (Streambed Alteration Agreement No. 1600-2015-0028-R4)
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
2/2/2016
Present Land Use
Existing land use is transportation. River bed is zoned as Open Space by the City of Fresno and Madera County.
Document Description
CDFW has executed streambed alteration agreement no. 1600-2015-0028-R4, pursuant to section 1602 of the fish and game code to the project applicant, Caltrans.
The project involves upgrading the two bridges on the old SR 41 crossing the San Joaquin River. The southern of the pair (bridge #42-0112), the San Joaquin River Bridge also known as Lane's Bridge, will require scour and seismic retrofit, and also an upgrade to the bridge rails. The northern of the pair (bridge 41-0040), the San Joaquin River Overflow Bridge, will undergo an upgrade to the bridge rails and will not require scour or seismic retrofit work.
Contact Information
Name
Laura Peterson-Diaz
Agency Name
CDFW Central
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Cities
Fresno
Counties
San Joaquin
Cross Streets
nearest cross street, Avenue 9, is north of project limits
Zip
93720
State Highways
Hwy 41
Waterways
San Joaquin River
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
CDFW
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.