2018 Kings County Regional Transportation Plan and Sustainable Communities Strategy
5 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2013101053
Lead Agency
Kings County
Document Title
2018 Kings County Regional Transportation Plan and Sustainable Communities Strategy
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
8/27/2018
Present Land Use
County-wide project that includes all the cities and unincorporated areas within Kings County
Document Description
The 2018 RTP-SCS is the long-range planning document that will have a horizon year of 2042 and is an update to the 2014 RTP. The RTP is aimed at bringing about a well balanced and efficient transportation system within Kings County. The RTP will address all transportation modes including motor vehicles, transit (commuter and local), rail (commuter and interregional), goods movement (rail freight and trucking), bicycle and pedestrian facilities, aviation systems, and transportation systems management (TSM) programs and projects. Also included is a Sustainable Communities Strategy (SCS) that details how the Kings County region will reduce our GHG emissions from passenger vehicles and light duty trucks to achieve the reduction targets as set by the CA ARB.
Contact Information
Name
Terri King
Agency Name
Kings County Association of Governments
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Counties
Kings
Regions
Countywide
Cross Streets
County Wide
State Highways
I-5, 41, 46, 198, 269
Railways
BNSF
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
Kings County
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
Yes
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
Yes
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.